GROUP RANTS

Hypocritical Hypocrites who are Hypocritical about other Hypocrites -Teal

Admit it. We all judge people.

And even though "don't judge a book by its cover" is a highly respected and viewed statement, we still can't deny human instincts.

Our human instincts are all based on helping us survive. It's just human nature.

So of course, when you you meet a stranger, your mind will quickly (or slowly) analyze them, whether you like it or not.

Don't try to deny it. But this isn't exactly the point that I'm trying to make.

It's hypocritical. The thing is, everyone is a hypocrite and everyone despises hypocrites. So basically, everyone despises everyone because hypocritically, everyone is doing exactly what they don't want everyone else doing.

But people can get along with hypocrites. The world is full of us hypocritical beings.

The ones who are the most difficult to deal with, however, are the hypocrite squad leaders. Allow me to introduce, the HYPOCRITICAL HYPOCRITES WHO ARE HYPOCRITICAL ABOUT HYPOCRITES!!

But I don't know, I might just be a very hating person.

Now. You don't even need to know someone in person to detect if they are a hypocritical hypocrite who is hypocritical about hypocrites.

Because surprisingly, hypocritical hypocrites who are hypocritical about hypocrites are very easy to detect. Especially if they are so hypocritical about it that they won't ever shut up about how hypocritical other people are.

And I just realized that I fit perfectly into this category right now. Oh well...

I still remember that one time when I was on Wattpad and I stumbled across a hypocritical hypocrite who was hypocritical about other hypocrites. Man.... It looked like such a painful argument....

It was in the comments section of a very controversial topic that someone wrote about.

It was a "Why A is Better than B" story.

And this hypocritical hypocrite who was hypocritical about other hypocrites was an obvious "B" supporter.

So the "B" supporter stirred up an argument with an "A" supporter. The "A" supporter wasn't even trying to argue. So when another "A" supporter tried to help the first "A" supporter, the "B" supporter demanded them to leave. And of course, that's pretty hypocritical seeing that if the "B" supporter hated "A" so much, they should be the one to leave. The "B" supporter was also the one who started the argument tin the first place. But "A" supporters kept on trying to help each other out. And the "B" supporter got really angry and started to complain about hypocrites.

I would understand if the "B" supporter wanted to read the "A" topic, but they didn't have to fight on an "enemy's" ground and then complain about the "enemy" trying to fight back.

I mean, isn't that the point of an argument? To have two or more sides who disagree about things so that you can debate it out?

I really don't get hypocritical hypocrites who are hypocritical about other hypocrites.

But hey, hypocrites don't know that they're hypocrites, so I may as well be a hypocritical hypocrite who is hypocritical about other hypocrites.

(I actually fit into my own definition. That just makes me even more hypocritical because I don't like hypocritical hypocrites who are hypocritical about other hypocrites, yet I fit perfectly into my own definition of people I don't like.)

Well. I guess I do get hypocritical hypocrites who are hypocritical about hypocrites, then.

SPARKLE ON, UNICORNS!!!!!!!!!

-Teal