So Much for No Strings Attached

Chapter 68 Breaking News

The Malfoy-Potter Scandal

 

Since the attack on Heir Hadrian Slytherin there have been many rumours about our young Boy-Who-Lived’s status who has been yet to be seen. It was known that he was one of the fourteen to be committed to St. Mungo’s after the incident on the first of August. Jenny Krause, 64, of Hogsmeade who witnessed the event has this to say:

 

“The Healers were treating me for the head injury from a stray bludgeoning curse when I heard a Healer shout “pregnant minor, collapsed, with malnutrition” I looked up and saw that it was Harry Potter – I recognised him from your articles. I can’t believe he’s pregnant – he’s just a boy. It is totally irresponsible.”

 

You heard it here first Hadrian Salazar Slytherin, the Boy Who Lived, is pregnant at only fifteen. I am sure my readers are speculating on who the father of the Slytherin Heir’s child is. Hadrian Slytherin did attend the Quidditch match with Heir Draco Malfoy, so he is the obvious candidate. But this it appears is not true as was discovered when speaking to an anonymous source within St. Mungo’s:

 

“The Aurors were guarding the door to Harry Potter’s room when Lucius Malfoy came barging in. Naturally his guard refused to let a Death Eater into see the Boy Who Lived!”

 

We would like to remind the readers that Lord Lucius Malfoy was fully exonerated in 1981 having proven that he was acting under the influence of mind control, specifically the Imperius Curse. Thus, none of the crimes committed by Lucius Malfoy was Lucius Malfoy culpable for. And since that day Lord Malfoy has worked hard for the betterment of the Wizarding World in the Wizengamot, the Hogwarts Board of Governors and his international business – Malfoy Enterprises.

 

“Lord Malfoy was not pleased by that and demanded entry to Harry Potter’s room even claiming that Harry Potter’s child was his!’

 

So, if this source is to be believed it is not Draco Malfoy but his father who is the true father. This journalist should note that the legal age of consent in Britain is thirteen so there is nothing illegal done on the part of Lord Malfoy. Although, it is highly questionable due to age difference and the obvious trauma that Heir Slytherin has lived through his childhood and the manipulation of Lord Dumbledore leaving him in a vulnerable position. Did Lord Malfoy take advantage of a young Heir’s vulnerable state of mind? One must wonder what Lord Slytherin who has only just found his son might think although it might explain Lord Slytherin’s campaign for more protection of children. But is it true, our source certainly doubts it:

 

‘I think he was lying to gain access to Heir Slytherin that could not be refuted as by law the Aurors could be accused of line theft should he try to keep his unborn child from him. And if it is true it is disgusting that such an old man has seduced a child!’