Cartoon Conspiracies

Disney

Okay I talked about Disney Subliminal messages before, and yes there are lots of them. LOTS. Now, I just wanna talk about Disney.

After some facts I watched about Disney, and seeing their subliminal messages, I was thinking if these were meant to be sexual or see just look sexual to the eyes of the fans. To me, some look like they're put purposely, like the shirtless lady and the Goofy has a skateboard with the Illuminati eye and triangle screws on his wheels (I know it looks not purposely placed, but the eye of the illuminati was there. I promise I watched this episode on TV and have the dvd).

Then there's the sexual to the fans part. Like the lion silhouette on the sky looking like a guy staring to a naked lady or the had that looks like a penis. Yes I said it. It is the scientific form guys, it's on my science book from 5th grade. Don't be too childish about me saying penis.

To me, I really should not think these are sexual, since this is a form of lust as a Catholic Christian. But I am green minded a bit I mean a lot (I'm so sorry.). I used to believe Disney is bad, and I actually don't know if these were purposely done, and since these signs were repeated over and over again, it seemed like something to believe. Because it felt like Disney won't stop, some words like sex keeps appearing over and over again.

I'm literally sick of all this. I really don't like Disney (but I love their shows, I admit.). But showing these things in kids' shows is really bad. Their parents would probably get the references on these pictures.

But anyways, back to if this is purposely put or not, remember the scene in the Lion King where Simba lies down then sparkles appear? Remember the sparkles looked like 'sex'? Okay guys, it's actually representing SFX. So I guess they have their reason here, but all those other things that keep saying sex, does it really say SFX?

If you watch some videos on YouTube, you can see the things that say sex like in the moves Frozen and Tangled. But Disney never reasoned about it, or even say it resembled SFX not sex. But they just left it be. It's just irritating if this will continue over and over again.

Disney also hasn't explained some other sexual references, except the castle of Ariel in The Little Mermaid. The castle wasn't really meant to resemble a penis, claimed by the artist. Also the lion king SFX thing I explained a while ago.

Well,  maybe Disney never explained these things because they weren't meant to be sexual? Look, The castle looked like a penis  and the hat of Mickey did as well, but they never explained Mickey's reason.

Well anyways, what do you think? Is Disney purposely making this sexual? Or is it the fans?