Author's Note

103 0 0
                                    

This is an updated and lengthened version of my Fanganronpa book:
Danganronpa: Misinterpreted Lies and Empty Promises.
On this chapter, I will clarify anything that might be confusing about the way I write this.

Speech will be presented like this:
First-name Surname:
"..."

Thoughts will be presented like this:
First-name Surname (thinking...):
...

When a class trial starts, it will be shown like this:
Case 0
First-name Surname:
"Let's start with a brief introduction of the case."

Arguments are a little different. They will be shown like this:
>> Name of Truth Bullet >>

First-name Surname:
"..."

They will continue talking about the subject until a weak point appears. This means that there is a contradiction in what the person has said, specifically the part that is highlighted in italics. Here is an example that I took from Danganronpa: Trigger Happy Havoc:
Chihiro Fujisaki:
"So it seems most likely that... The killer must have taken her by surprise in the bathroom! She didn't even have a chance to resist..."

You can also "Agree" with the person. It will be shown in the same way as of above. In the later text, the protagonist or other student will explain why they have agreed/disagreed with that statement roughly following the lines:

First-name Surname:
"Student A, I notice something contradictory about what you just told us. Didn't the killer do such and such because insert truth bullet statement?"

Or...

First-name Surname:
"That is a great point, Student A! The reason that the killer did such and such is because insert the student's statement and its backed up with insert truth bullet statement."

Danganronpa: Misinterpreted Lies and Empty Promises (ON HIATUS)Where stories live. Discover now