101 Reasons Why I Hate Being a BOOK Fangirl

100. When authors should/shouldn't write a sequel.

100. When authors should/shouldn't write a sequel.

To sequel or not to sequel?

 

Not going to lie, I have skipped the sequel to many books because I read books to escape reality.

 

The thing about most stories is, everything gets solved in the end, it's happy, and if I want to imagine that the happiness says and they get married and have babies with limited relationship problems I will!

 

I know that sounds fake and isn't how the real world works, but I don't care because it's a book, it's not the real world so I can stay in my own little bubble if I want.

 

Often in sequels, it's the same relationship just going through more problems, I DON'T WANT TO READ THAT!

 

THERE WERE ENOUGH IN THE FIRST BOOK.

 

(This is usually only for Wattpad books so calm down)

 

The only "sequels" I usually read are spin-offs or if the first book leaves unanswered questions.

 

That brings me onto the section where I talk about the fact that some authors really should write a sequel.

 

It's as simple as this, if there are questioned unanswered, there should be a sequel.

 

So, when an author leaves questions unanswered, it's going to be like "An Imperial Affliction" for me and I'm going to want to know what happens to the hampster.

 

If you don't understand that reference reevaluate your life.

 

Anyways, it can be a constant struggle between sequel or no sequel,

 

Most of the time the answer is sequel, but if you're a writer and you're sequel is turning into the first book with the same old fighting only different reasons, please stop.

 

I may be alone in this because most people love sequels,

 

But sometimes it just feels like you're dragging out the inevitable,

The ending.