Harry Potter vs. Twilight

What Twilight has going for it debunked pt. 2

58. Meyer is creative she even made her own type of vampire
First of all, those aren't vampires. Do your research. Oh wait, if Meyer had actually done hers we wouldn't be having this problem!!! And does J. K. strike you as unimaginative in some way?

59. He movie might not be faithful to the book but at least the cast are good
Are they as good as the cast of Harry Potter? Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner's acting careers have been ruined because of Twilight. And the Harry Potter movies stayed pretty true to the books.

60. IT has a graphic novel
So does Harry Potter. Harry Potter also has an unofficial cookbook, and three other books (Quidditch Through the Ages, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them, and The Tales of Beetle the Bard).

61. Stephenie Meyer actually did her research and found an an actual place called Forks so the vampires could be outside Rowling just made one up
Isn't Stephenie Meyer from Washington? No research whatsoever if that's the case. And J. K. Rowling hid an entire world in London. Which one is harder?

62. It's vampires in the normal world, not vampires living in a vampire world undercover
Okay, what? Harry Potter is set in the real world, with witches and wizards not telling their muggle neighbours and friends that they can do magic. In Twilight, these so-called vampires don't tell people that they're vampires. They're undercover, just like witches and wizards.

63. The sparkles are so unique and creative. They're not stupid.
Okay, can I puke? The sparkles are dumb. It accentuates the fact that they're not actually vampires, but super fast leeches with glitter. They're not creative. They are unique only in how idiotic they are.

64. They are immortal and they do have to survive on blood. I do agree they're not exactly like traditional vampires, but they have some of the main traits.
This comment comes to us from Salma-Akarri.
1) Vamps BURN in the sun.
2) Vamps don't eat human food.
3) Vamps can't control the urge to attack humans WHEN they see blood.
4) Vamps DO NOT SPARKLE.
5) Vamps can't survive without blood.
6) Vamps hate Meyer for offending them.

65. Twilight has passion, mystery, sadness
And...Harry Potter...doesn't? I think Harry Potter has all of that and a lot more. There are mysteries in every single book. Harry is passionate about Quidditch. His love for Ginny is a passion. Ron and Hermione are passionate for each other. You don't need me to get started on sadness with Harry Potter.

66. Its interesting
Um, no it isn't. It's one of the most boring books I have ever read. And if a Twi-hard says it's because I haven't read good literature, I can assure you: I have read books much, much better than Twilight. Heck, The Epic of Gilgamesh is better.

67. Its won mtv movie awards for best movie of the year when new moon came out and halfblood prince it was twilight who won best movie of the year
Ow. That hurt my brain cells. I'm not even sure what she's trying to say. Something about the Twilight movies doing better than the Harry Potter movies? And in any case, the least successful Harry Potter movie made more money than the most successful Twilight movie.

68. besides the characters being hot, when you read the books you instantly fall inlove with the character edward and the book has no pictures edwards personality in the books and movies is just charming and jacob hes so sweet.
Once again, my brain cells are being tortured.
Anyway, let's go through this piece by piece. "Besides the characters being hot, you instantly fall in love with them." I don't need looks to fall in love with a character. And guess what, twi-hard? We didn't have pictures, either! Now, Edward's personality. He seemed like he was depressed the entire time--ooh, and I love how he was abusive and a stalker! Now, Jacob. He's sweet?!?! He freaking fell in love with a cannibalistic demon baby! Oh, wait. We can't use the word love. So we have to use the word imprint.