What if everything you believe is a lie? What if Jesus (or what ever god you believe exists) never even existed? What if everyone was damned to eternal torment, before they were even born, without a chance of escape? It's true, I've lived with the r...
I'm creating several smaller articles, which are a part of a whole. In this article, I'll focus on similarities between accepted astronomical figures (mass, gravity,etc) and the numbers in the 'genealogies' of genesis. And there are many. I work hard and spend a lot of time on all my work. I know no one has come close to finding what I have on the subject. I retain all rights to my work, and do not give permission for anyone to use it without my consent. My contact information is at the end. What's thought by many to be the genealogy of the first human beings is a something you can't fathom. You may deny what I've written is correct. With the evidence I have, you probably won't be able to. You may refuse to read it, as a defense mechanism. Regardless, everything I've written is right.
My ultimate goal is to prove the belief in a loving, forgiving god is a lie. That everyone who has existed, exists, or will exist, was damned to eternal torment before they were even born. Proving it may or may not require much effort before you die. It will be EFFORTLESS afterwards. Your opinion on the matter is of no consequence to me, don't feel obligated to agree. It doesn't change the validity of my findings.
To start, I'll discuss the radius of the moon. And keep in mind, I haven't been able to completely solve the chart, so it's not possible to know exactly where the decimal places should be. All known figures come from these pages (Wikipedia Earth, Moon and Sun), unless otherwise noted.
circumference of the moon: 10921 km square root of column 3: √11926 = 109.2062 square root of 119 260 000 = 10920.62
Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
I did the calculations above long before I knew what the numbers really were. Although I knew they added up to something other than the names and ages of the first people to exist. Notice the top group, they are listed in the equation below. If each number in the top group represents turns (revolutions), see what happens when they're converted to arcseconds and gradians.
Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
The number '36288' is a known number in the Jewish calendar (36288 * 7 = 689472). A few things stand out in the image above. One, the highlighted numbers in the 'arcseconds' column are about the same as the sum of the whole group. And the top is less than 11758, the bottom greater than. Second, the highlighted numbers in the 'gradian' column are the same. Except one is less than 36288, one greater. The decimal places may not be exact, because my knowledge of angular conversion is limited to what I've learned recently. But I've found much more proof the genealogies are not what they seem. For instance, when the sums of each column in the first group (seen above) are divided by twenty-four and then seven, they equal nearly whole numbers.
If each side represent 3 ½ years, that's 36288 * 7 = 689472. If you haven't read my other articles, you wouldn't probably realize light travels about 5878.5 billion light years in a year (top group, col 3; 5879). Or that the top group is related to the sun, the solar year, etc. Or that '687' is related to the 687 year / 8497 lunation cycle. This is a precise astronomical chart, which involves the equations of square arcminutes in a sphere and gravity. I'll end this article with some references concerning Jewish timekeeping.
'The Metonic cycle is related to two less accurate subcycles:
· 8 years = 99 lunations (an ) to within 1.5 days, i.e. an error of one day in 5 years; and
· 11 years = 136 lunations within 1.5 days, i.e. an error of one day in 7.3 years.
By combining appropriate numbers of 11-year and 19-year periods, it is possible to generate ever more accurate cycles. For example, simple arithmetic shows that:
· 687 tropical years = 250,921.39 days;
· 8,497 lunations = 250,921.41 days.
This gives an error of only about half an hour in 687 years (2.5 seconds a year), although this is subject to secular variation in the length of the tropical year and the lunation.'
(Wikipedia, Metonic Cycle)
'A 689,472-Year Cycle
Warning: This section uses arithmetic. If that's a problem, you can skip over it.
We've already seen that the Jewish calendar is based on a 19-year cycle. Does that mean that the calendar repeats itself every 19 years? Well as far as the pattern of leap years and common years goes, that is true.
But what about the pattern of defective, normal, and complete years? That will repeat only if the time of the molad of Tishri repeats itself. So how many cycles will it take for the molad of Tishri to once again occur at the same time that it started with?
To answer that question, let's compute the time between the start of two consecutive 19-year cycles. Such a cycle consists of 235 months, and the time between the new moons of two consecutive months is 29 days, 12 hours, and 793 halaqim. Multiplying that out, we find that a 19-year cycle takes 6,939 days and 17,875 halaqim.
Since there are 25,920 halaqim in a day (1,080 times 24), the 17,875 halaqim represents a fractional day. So we need to accumulate enough cycles in order for the fractional days to add up to an integral number of days. The fraction is 17,875/25,920, which reduces to 3,575/5,184. In just 5,184 cycles, the fractional days will add up to exactly 3,575 days. And 5,184 cycles is 98,496 years (19 times 5,184).'
