What we are exploring: What is relevant to the individual world of experience?
What's new: What influences psychological individuality?
What we will learn: How to avoid identical learning?
1. The personal [individual, ed., author] world of experience is confidential, private, and can be known in a true or complete sense only by the subject himself [theory by C. Rogers, ed. author] (Kjell L., Ziegler D. 2008) [1].
2. Individual world of experience. According to the humanistic theory of C. Rogers * this is possible only for the individual himself, since the private world of human experience is confidential. The terms "confidential" and "private" draw attention to the availability and ownership of knowledge about one's mental differences exclusively for the person himself, and for others, it is a secret. Therefore, only an individual has the opportunity to acquire, in the process of his lifestyle, that is, private experience, genuine and complete knowledge about his psychological individuality.
* Rogers Carl Ransom (1902 - 1987) - American psychologist, one of the founders of humanistic psychology. Rogers turned out to be the sixth most outstanding psychologist of the 20th century and the second among clinicians after S. Freud. Based on a 1982 survey of 422 American and Canadian psychologists, he was considered the most influential psychotherapist in history.
3. Knowledge of experience. When science talks about experience, it uses the meaning of the term "experienceˮ, which originates from the ancient Greek word ἐμπειρικός [empeirikós], which means experience acquired through a test, experiment, or attempt *. Thus, a person who wishes to acquire true and complete knowledge of his psychic differences can do this by testing or testing his psyche. What does this not mean and what does it mean? Usually, people tend to think about a certain issue by resorting to the amount of information they have accumulated on it. But in this case, this does not mean that they are testing the psyche. Why? When a person wants to know how a car model will behave under different modes, then he conducts a test drive. During the test drive, he does not think that he knows about this model but observes how it behaves in different circumstances. Testing my psyche literally means asking myself what I experience through the senses of the private world as I go about my life, rather than what I know in general about human behavior.
* "Empirical". History and etymology are empirical. Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
4. Feelings of private experience. Speaking about sensations, psychology pays attention to sensations emanating from the physical sense organs (vision, hearing, smell, etc.) [2]. In this case, we are talking about sensations perceived from the material world, but not from the immaterial world of man. The immaterial world of a person is perceived by his psyche (from other Greek ψυχικός (psychikos) - soul or life), while the psyche does not have visible organs of perception, such as eyes, ears, nose, tongue, etc. However, every person can feel fear, anxiety, sadness, joy, anger, surprise, disappointment, etc. The question arises. With the help of what or what organs can a person experience these and many similar sensations of non-material content?
5. Organs for sensations. The basis for the emergence of sensations is the human nervous system, which instantly and accordingly reacts to any changes in the external or internal environment transmitted to it by the organs of the senses (from ancient Greek ὄργανον - [orɡanon], instrument, instrument). Consciousness, unconsciousness, preconscious memory, thinking, and perception are tools of the human psyche. Mental instruments (organs) of the senses, together with the physical sense organs, participate in the formation of sensations that reflect the perception of the material and immaterial world of a person with the help of a variety of feelings and emotions [2, 3, 4, 5]. The presence of the same instruments (organs) of perception, the ability to sense, and the appropriate reaction to changes in the external and internal environment make us identical. But how can neural reactions to environmental changes make us individual?
YOU ARE READING
What's wrong with the diet? Physiological component of the diet.
Non-FictionDedicated to the individual. On Fridays, continuation of the story. For those who are tired of controlling their diet, calories consumed, and physical activity. For those who have lost faith in diets and the help of various specialists. However, he...
