AFFIRMATIVE SIDE: The Anti-Terror Law Should Be Repealed
1. Vague Definitions and Overreach
The law’s vague definition of "terrorism" can lead to overreach, endangering civil liberties. Activities such as protests or criticism of the government might be interpreted as terrorism, violating the rights to freedom of speech and assembly.
2. Potential for Abuse
The law grants the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) broad powers, including warrantless arrests and prolonged detention without charges. This opens doors for abuse and can target innocent individuals or political dissenters.
3. Chilling Effect on Free Speech
Fear of being labeled as terrorists may silence critics and activists. This undermines democratic principles by discouraging active participation in civic discourse and dissent.
4. Existing Laws Are Sufficient
Current laws, such as the Human Security Act of 2007, already address terrorism. Repealing the Anti-Terror Law would prevent redundancy while protecting constitutional rights.
5. International Criticism
The United Nations and human rights organizations have expressed concerns over the law's compliance with international human rights standards. Its repeal would restore the country’s global standing.
---
NEGATIVE SIDE: The Anti-Terror Law Should Not Be Repealed
1. Strengthens National Security
The law provides clear mechanisms to prevent, investigate, and address terrorism effectively. In a volatile global climate, strong counter-terrorism measures are essential to protect citizens.
2. Safeguards Are in Place
The law includes provisions to prevent abuse, such as judicial oversight and penalties for wrongful detention. These safeguards ensure the law is implemented responsibly.
3. Adapts to Modern Threats
The evolving nature of terrorism, including cyberterrorism and transnational threats, requires updated legislation. The Anti-Terror Law addresses these modern challenges effectively.
4. Protects the Public from Harm
Acts of terrorism cause significant loss of life, economic damage, and societal fear. Retaining the law ensures proactive measures to mitigate these risks and uphold public safety.
5. Complementary to Democratic Values
A strong state response to terrorism demonstrates the government’s commitment to protecting democratic institutions and the rule of law. Proper enforcement will ensure both security and rights are upheld.
YOU ARE READING
BSED Major in Social Studies 2
Non-FictionThese materials provide lecture notes, quizzes, and resources for BSED Social Studies students, covering key topics such as history, geography, economics, and political science. Marjhon Mascardo shares a personal note, reflecting on his college jour...
