Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
Russian Section of the Comintern (SH)
100 years ago ...
"Social-Democracy is the objectively moderate wing of fascism. There is no reason to suppose that the militant organization of the bourgeoisie can achieve decisive successes in battles or in the administration of the country without the active support of Social-Democracy"
Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
(I. V. Stalin, 'Bolshevik' No. 11, September 20, 1924).
Even after 100 yearas, we will continue our struggle against all those treators who either betray or falsificate this famous quote of comrade Stalin !
For us Stalinist-Hoxhaists - this quote is still valid in theory and practice !
Despite the attempts of modern revisionists, such as Dimitrov and Khrushchev, to rehabilitate Social-Democracy and to force the Communists to work together with it, turning the Communists into the left wing of the Social-Democratic parties, the definition given by Comrade Stalin is extremely relevant to this day:
"Social-Democracy is the objectively moderate wing of fascism. There is no reason to suppose that the militant organization of the bourgeoisie can achieve decisive successes in battles or in the administration of the country without the active support of Social-Democracy" (I. V. Stalin, 'Bolshevik' No. 11, September 20, 1924).
What historical evidence is there for this definition? The most important fact is the year 1933 in Germany. The Social Democratic Party did nothing to stop Nazism. On the contrary, it fought furiously against the German Communist Party, which allowed the Nazis to take power unimpeded and murder tens of millions of people around the world.
The treacherous 7th Congress of the Comintern in 1935 initiated the cooperation of the Communist Parties with the Social Democrats and rejected Comrade Stalin's definition, which brought much misery to the world communist movement. The Dimitrov "people's front" created a solid basis for Khrushchev-Brezhnev revisionism and the denial of the class struggle, the denial of the socialist revolution and the transition to the "peaceful" path of parliamentarism and parliamentary "unions". Dimitrov's "popular front" created a social-fascist GDR, whose ruling party was a "united front" with the Social-Democrats. The Social Fascist "Stasi" repressed and murdered communists. Dimitrovism created fertile ground for the degeneration of the Communist Parties of Eastern Europe. Instead of uniting the people and the working masses under the leadership of united labor parties, social-democratic elements corroded these "fronts" from within, for these elements did not abandon their views at all, but promoted them intensely and eventually subjugated the ruling parties of the Eastern European countries to themselves. They all became social-fascist countries, just as in the GDR, where the KPD/ML was repressed as "state enemy No 1".
The Eastern European countries were ruled by a new revisionist bourgeoisie which were subjugated under the rule of Soviet social imperialism.
As comrade Enver Hoxha teaches: The only genuine socialist countries, where the dictatorship of the proletariat was really established by the socialist revolution - have been only the Soviet Union of Lenin and Stalin and socialist Albania. In both countries capitalism was restored.
"As in Hungary, East Germany, Romania and other countries, the party in Poland was formed by the mechanical merger of bourgeois, so-called workers', parties. This may have been necessary to unite the proletariat under the leadership of one single party, but such a merger should have been preceded by a great deal of ideological, political and organizational work, so that the former members of other parties should not only be assimilated, but also - and this is the most important thing - thoroughly educated on Marxist-Leninist ideological and organizational norms. But this was not done either in Poland, Hungary or elsewhere, and in fact it turned out that the members of the bourgeois parties were renamed, became "communists", retaining, however, their old views, their old outlook. Thus, the parties of the proletariat not only did not become stronger, but, on the contrary, weakened, because such social-democrats and opportunists as Cirankiewicz, Marošan, Grotewohl and others with their views took root in them." (Enver Hoxha, The Khrushchevites, pp. 311
This is what Stalin's discarding of Stalin's thesis of Social Democracy as the moderate wing of fascism led to.
The modern social-democratic parties are no different from other bourgeois parliamentary parties. They crush labor demonstrations with the same vigor as the Conservatives and Liberals. The British Labor Party and the German SPD are examples of this. Russia's "Spravedlivaya Rossiya" also fully supports the Russian government's actions in domestic and foreign policy (including the "SMO").
Long live our dear comrade Stalin!
Long live Marxism-Leninism-Stalinism-Hoxhaism!
Down with the revisionist treachery of the 7th Congress of the Comintern!
Without smashing both twins – fascism and social-fascism – there will be no victory for the world socialist revolution!
Modern revisionism paved (and neo-revisionism still paves !) the way for social fascism! Social fascism, in turn, paves the way for fascism!
Neo-revisionism destroyed socialist Albania and paved the way for the rule of social democracy – the twin brother of fascism.
We Stalinist-Hoxhaists define this the restoration of the twins of fasism and social-democratism.
Down with social democracy as the moderate wing of fascism!
The definition of Social Democracy as a moderate wing of fascism is the only correct definition!
Russian Section in coordination with the Red Front Fighters' League,
