Chapter 22: I agree

2 1 0
                                    


  Gordon University, conference room, an impromptu meeting, the discussion was about one thing, that is, the article that made a big fuss on Twitter.

  The article was about an undergraduate student who had published nine consecutive computer SCI papers in one month. Using this as a basis, it criticized the academic culture of universities, criticized one journal for its laxity in reviewing papers, and named the undergraduate student as being from Gordon University.

  This is simply to put Gordon university on the fire.

  In the meeting, an old professor at the College of Software pushed his glasses, stood up and said nonchalantly, "...... I've read those nine papers, in fact, the writing is quite good, undergraduates can write such a paper, it's really not too easy. It is really far-fetched point, to say that he is spamming, many computer journals manuscript quality is not as good as him. That ...... education reviewer, probably doesn't understand information technology at all, maybe if we communicate with him and point out his mistakes, we should be able to get him to delete that post."

  Will more paper publishing lead to criticism instead? Many professors were confused, this conference was simply inexplicable!

  "Unrealistic ...... That guy, what level of knowledge is he not clear himself? Look at his title, education commentator, science writer, " The person is clearly to mess up, and What do you discuss?"

  This matter is indeed not easy to handle.

  First of all, the student was not at fault, and the university could not have punished the student, but now public opinion has formed a one-sided denunciation.

  And the whole thing is also funny to say, completely is an outsider through their own social status advantage to point fingers.

  But no matter what, this incident has caused a serious impact on the reputation of the university!

  "It's not a question of whether the paper is well written or not, but the public has questioned the academic ethos of our university, and it's imperative that we now answer the questioning and clarify it to the public. On the other hand, we also need to figure out what is going on!", the president of the University said.

  After discussion, two decisions were finally made at this meeting.

  On the one hand, for the sake of the university's reputation, an announcement was issued to clarify the academic value of the paper, while a lawyer's letter warned the author of this Twitter post and demanded an apology. On the other hand, the leaders of the faculties and departments were asked to find out about this undergraduate student and ask what exactly was going on.

  Nine SCIs in a month does sound a bit magical. Although some professors at the College of Software here have also had the experience of flooding, no one has ever been so crazy!

  However, at this time, the professors do not know, in fact, Orion really did submit ten paper, only the other one is not for IT journal, it is maths ......

  ......

  Twitter, comment section.

  [Crap, an undergrad publishing nine SCIs, lie, is this stuff that good?]

  [...... Feeling like I'm on I can do it. (dog head)]

  [Support posting! Fight the academic tumour! Correct this unhealthy trend! (Fist) (Fist)]

  [As a student at MIT, this phenomenon is completely impossible at MIT, and the contributors must have exploited the loopholes of some of the journals' pseudo-review mechanisms. ......]

Orion Crest, Series_1Where stories live. Discover now