Alright guys it's about that time and today's question of the day is: Do you think animal (real life) vs battles are much more than regular vs battles? As of the making of this 3 people responded and there's got to be some confusion involved here.
Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
No offense but we are not talking about stuff 1 gorilla vs 100 men we are talking about 2 or more animals fighting each other in fight to see who comes out on top just like we are doing with financial vs battles. With that being said though I would say animal vs battles is probably more fun than fictional.
Now you see the thing about vs battles involving fictional characters most of the time people are just debating over whether or not these characters could win or not. This is also where powerscaling comes into play where people try to use real life logic and attempt to apply that to any feats or statements made from various characters which is fine and all but the problem is people will sometimes consider everything they said is correct based on calculations they've made when realistically speaking all of these feats and even the characters themselves would be far beyond any human comprehension so much so that no amount of calculating TNTs worth of output would not change the fact that if many of these fictional characters existed in real life they would be far beyond normal logic even reality warpers so in any case the characters could be strong as we think or not it's really a 50-50 chance (especially cosmic tier characters). At the end of the day powerscaling and vs battles involving fictional characters is subjective not objective powerscaling is how you view things and nobody else can you otherwise there's no facts just opinions.
But that's not the case when it comes to vs battles involving animals because unlike with fictional characters, animals actually exist in real life there for using real life logic will definitely apply here. What makes animal battles much more interesting is that you don't need to do ridiculous calculations trying to find which character can destroy whatever tons of TNT or which character can move this fast, all you need to do is do a simple Google search as to how strong or fast the animals are and you're pretty much golden, and unlike fictional characters you actually need facts to determine who would win based on simple research like it would be easy to discover who would win between a lion or a tiger, a wolf or a fox, a falcon and a hawk, a grizzly bear or a polar bear, a dolphin and a porpoise, or even a cat or a dog. You can also look up videos or watch a couple of animal documentaries because they actually take place in real life. Plus once the facts are presented any debate to dispute otherwise would stop immediately and not end toxic unlike with fictional debates. So I'd definitely say yes animal vs battles are more fun.
