WTF: Pointless and Dumb

368 41 91
                                    

DUMB CHARACTERS:

The 8th story in the Harry Potter saga (pardon my vomit if it gets a little... splashy...) introduced fans to a few new characters, as well as bringing some into the limelight that apparently didn't get enough attention in the books. I'm going to discuss three of them.


Panju

In the alternate universes, Cedric lost the first task and Hermione went with Ron to the Yule Ball. This meant that Ron and Padma ended up getting married in the future. I'll get to why this is beyond stupid later, but let's just touch on their offspring, Panju, cousin to Albus. I don't need to say much, do I? Nah, I trust you guys to hear when I lmao.

Panju.

All right, Jo. All right.


Theodore Nott

In case you need a reminder, Nott was a "weedy-looking" Slytherin who was first introduced in Order of the Phoenix, when Draco was discussing how their fathers were Death Eaters. The next time we heard that name was in the Department of Mysteries after the shelves of prophecies had collapsed. Referring to the boy's father, Lucius Malfoy said, "Leave Nott, leave him, I say - his injuries will be nothing to the Dark Lord compared to losing that prophecy."

Instance number three came an entire book later, when students were discussing Slughorn's club, and how Theodore Nott didn't get an invitation. We see Nott "sniggering" and "whispering" with Draco in Potions a few chapters later, and then, lastly, a vague reference to Nott's father in a Pensieve memory from Dumbledore.

That's it. For the whole series.

So, Theodore Nott was mentioned like... three times. He definitely belongs in the play, I agree. Why would the writers, in a story that completely leaves out MAJOR characters from the books, choose to have SO MUCH of the plot revolve around one of the least-important background characters ever? Are we really expected to believe that Theodore Nott was the architect of the new Time-Turners? The guy who was rejected from Slug Club as a student was responsible, as an adult, for reinventing a magical device that could take you further back in time than ever before? And could now change history? Mmmmmm mmmm mmmm kay. No.


Craig Barker Jr. (I know it's Bowker.)

So, not only is this name just kind of stupid, but it's too closely acquainted with another junior from the series: Barty Crouch Jr. CB Junior meets BC Junior... Conspiracy!

*quickly draws an Illuminati symbol in the air above laptop*

*stares at it while nodding*

Bowker was such a throwaway character and was introduced merely to be killed off. Which means we have absolutely no connection with him or any reason to feel saddened by his death. The play tries to make up for this by having the Minister of Magic, Hermione Granger-Weasley, mention him in passing during the Grand Meeting at the start of Act Four.


HERMIONE: His name was Craig Bowker. He was a good boy.


Bwahahahaaa!!

Rowling. On. The. Floor.

His name was Craig Bowker. He was a good boy. What is this, a dog funeral? Let us all share a moment of silence for him. Ruff. lol. Is this the epitaph on a dog's headstone or his obituary or something? Here lies Craig Bowker Jr. What a Good boy!!! He always bowked at the mailman. Good boy, Craig. Who's a good boy? Come here, let me scratch your little nosie. You're a good boy! Yes, yes yes. Oh, yes you are. Yes... Now go do my homework. No. No, we're not going to use the Time-Turner to save your life. No. No, we aren't, you little furry boy. Who's a good little furry boy? You are. Yes...

Not My Canon!Where stories live. Discover now