Existentialist Rant

32 0 0
                                        

It's tomorrow. Today is tomorrow. And tomorrow is tomorrow. It doesn't feel like tomorrows should be allowed to exist. Tomorrow shouldn't be. Existences stop existing and yet existence continues to exist. Things continue continuing, and that's not right. People continue doing things and going about with their shit nothingness and it's not right. Things just shouldn't go. They never stop, they're constant. And yet, people stop. People stop being people. I don't know if people stop being people just because they die. They stop living. But personhood is confusing. It's more philosophical than I want it to be right now. People continue with having existed. they do, technically, exist in time. But they aren't interacting anymore. Is interaction what makes someone a person? The will to act, the will to not act. If it's not interaction that makes a person such, is it will? And if it is will, does it have to be free will, and does free will even exist? It does. I've decided it does. You don't have to agree, but it does. Because I don't know if free will is limited to the conscious. It might exist in the way things go about on their own, in space, immeasurable. Things react from other things and are influenced by other things but that doesn't make it unfree. Of course gun to head punch your sister, it's not free will. But going left because lightning strikes can be free will. It's a personal decision. Determinism doesn't undermine free will, it just effects it. Semicompatibilism. I looked it up, it's a word. I hate that things exist. I wish that nothing existed. There'd be no good or bad or truth or falsehood. No life or death. Just void.



Dumb Ass Shit™Where stories live. Discover now